Facing a debt collection lawsuit in Louisiana or Oklahoma can be daunting. However, understanding the legal process and the strategies available to you for your debt collection defense is essential. In many cases, your defense’s success hinges on scrutinizing how the plaintiff handled the service of process and recognizing whether arbitration must occur before a lawsuit is filed. Improper service and overlooked arbitration clauses can provide powerful defenses that may help you avoid an adverse judgment.
Louisiana law requires that defendants be properly served with a citation and petition to ensure they are aware of the lawsuit and have the opportunity to respond. However, issues with improper service often arise in debt collection cases.
For example, in the case Beneficial Louisiana, Inc. v. Nash, 55 So.3d 803 (La. App. 2010)the court overturned a judgment because of discrepancies in the plaintiff’s documentation. The defendant argued that the account number listed was incorrect. The court reversed the judgment, remanding the case for further proceedings. This case highlights the importance of ensuring that all aspects of service are correct and that the plaintiff’s evidence is reliable.
Improper service occurs when the plaintiff fails to follow legal procedures for notifying the defendant. Common issues include:
If you believe that service was improper, you can challenge it using a “declinatory exception of insufficiency of citation” under Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 925(A)(1). This legal tool allows you to argue that the court does not have jurisdiction over you because of defective service. If the court agrees, it may dismiss the case or require the plaintiff to re-serve you properly.
Another critical aspect of debt collection defense in Louisiana involves arbitration clauses in contracts. Many consumer contracts, including credit card agreements, contain arbitration provisions that require disputes to be resolved through arbitration rather than in court. These clauses often state that the defendant cannot go to court, have a jury trial, or participate in a class action if a dispute arises.
Louisiana courts strongly favor arbitration. For instance, in Lakeland Anesthesia, Inc. v. United Healthcare of Louisiana, the court emphasized the strong presumption in favor of arbitration. The Louisiana Supreme Court has clarified this. If an arbitration agreement exists, the court must stay the trial until arbitration occurs.
If you are facing a debt collection lawsuit and the contract includes an arbitration clause, the plaintiff may be required to pursue arbitration first. This can be a strong defense strategy, potentially delaying the lawsuit or leading to dismissal if the plaintiff fails to follow proper arbitration procedures.
To use this defense effectively, you must demonstrate that:
In a case where a credit card company filed a lawsuit to collect a debt, the defendant argued that the case should go to arbitration because the original agreement included an arbitration clause. The court agreed and stayed the proceedings until the arbitration was completed.
If you are served with a debt collection lawsuit in Louisiana, consider these steps to help avoid a default judgment:
Debt collection lawsuits can be intimidating. Knowing your rights and the legal defenses available can make a significant difference. By challenging improper service and utilizing arbitration clauses, you can protect yourself from unwarranted judgments. Louisiana courts take these defenses seriously, and with the right strategy, you can navigate the legal system successfully.
Whether facing a lawsuit in a Louisiana or Oklahoma Judicial District Court or seeking to avoid a judgment, understanding how to leverage these defenses is crucial. If you’re unsure, seek the assistance of a skilled debt collection defense attorney who can guide you through the process and help you achieve the best possible outcome.
Photo Credit: Sabastian Pichler